Often-times, well intentioned people over-react without recognition of the consequences of their actions. Unfortunately, we only need to look at the Ag Youth Labor Regulations being proposed by the Department of Labor (DOL) for a first-hand look at what happens when idealistic conflicts with reality.

Family farms are an important part of our heritage and critical to produce the abundant food our nation needs. Farmers learn technical skills and practical knowledge as young people helping out on the farms of their family and neighbors. They not only gain valuable experience, but develop character and learn the importance of a strong work ethic. Apparently, the DOL believes it knows better and cares more deeply for the children of family farmers and should have jurisdiction to decide what is and isn’t appropriate for their children. Farms and families go hand-in-hand, and prohibiting members of the family from assisting with farm activity proves that government regulation has gone too far.

If enacted, these proposed new rules would in essence prohibit teenagers from gaining practical agricultural work experience. While I think we all understand the fact that agriculture can be dangerous at times and that safety must remain a priority, we should not limit our ability to raise the next generation of farmers and ranchers. I trust that parents, grandparents and other family members care far more deeply about the safety of their own children than government bureaucrats and know what are and aren’t acceptable and safe job roles for their teenage children.

Future farmers often learn how to drive and operate small tractors around the farm under the supervision of trusted adults. They use electronic communications devices, such as cell phones or CB radios, to coordinate with other employees or to guide a wagon hitch onto a tractor, not to text their friends. The new changes would seriously impact how young Americans learn the skills it takes carry on the legacy of their family farm so that they can help to provide a wholesome and affordable food supply into the future.

Furthermore, this new proposal would have other negative consequences. The potential prohibition of youth harvesting fruits and vegetables would prevent young teens from working what are considered traditional summer jobs in rural America. This regulation would create an even tighter supply of agricultural labor at a time when finding needed workers have proven difficult.

I am convinced that farmers take a keen interest in the safety of their farming operations for all workers, regardless of age. While I’m committed to protecting young workers in all industries, I believe these changes go way too far and would unnecessarily drive a wedge between family farmers and their own children.

Given that the comment period fell during the hectic fall harvest season, many family farmers were given insufficient time to comment on a rule that could fundamentally disrupt traditional agriculture practices across the country and cut at the core values of what we respect most about family farms — the family.

I proudly cosigned a letter in October to DOL requesting a 60-day extension of the comment period so that the DOL could hear directly from America’s family farmers. Unfortunately, DOL did not fulfill this request and the comment period for this harmful new rule ended December 1, 2011.

While DOL is in the process of reviewing the comments received before the deadline, I will continue to keep a close eye on this issue and work with my colleagues to ensure that the concerns of family farmers are fully heard before DOL moves forward with this new rule.

The border agreement reached by President Barack Obama and Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper is the best news we have had for the Blue Water Bridge in a decade.

As chairwoman of the Homeland Security Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security, I have had hearings highlighting the need for the administration to put a stronger focus on changes to facilitate trade across our borders, lower wait times for those who cross the border and to make the infrastructure investments needed to achieve these goals. I am hopeful this agreement will help us to accomplish all of these goals.

This new cross-border plan correctly identifies the need to improve our infrastructure at the border. Particularly, the strategy calls for coordinating border infrastructure investments and identifies the Blue Water Bridge as a priority that will free up the needed federal resources so we can complete the long overdue Blue Water Bridge Plaza project.

I am very encouraged the president singled out the automotive and agriculture industries as priorities in developing this plan. This again signals the emphasis placed on the Blue Water Bridge because of the great amount of trade in both those industries which cross the bridge every day.

It is vital to our economy and jobs that these goals be achieved and I will continue to conduct the appropriate oversight to make certain we achieve success. Many of these elements can be put in place quickly so we can increase the control of our border while improving the overall traffic flow.

Canada is our nation's No.1 trading partner and many manufacturing operations in both the United States and Canada are dependent upon the timely delivery of goods across the border. In addition, our agriculture sector is dependent on quick access to markets on each side of the border and the changes outlined in the agreement will help streamline the process to allow farmers to reach their customers in a quick and efficient manner.

I also believe the Blue Water Bridge should be used as a test site for many of the pilot programs being created by this plan. I have long contended that the Blue Water Bridge offers a perfect artery for a pre-inspection and pre-clearance system to facilitate trade.

This agreement contemplates just such a plan, and I will work forcefully to make certain those manufacturers who transit goods across the Blue Water Bridge will have access to just such a system.

I am pleased this deal calls for increased information sharing for the entry and exit of our travelers. My subcommittee has looked closely at the visa overstay problem which represent nearly 40% of the illegal aliens in our nation.

It is my hope the additional information sharing outlined in this plan will contribute to a more robust entry/exit system as recommended by the 9/11 Commission that will help us better identify those who have violated the terms of their visa so that appropriate action can be taken.

The people of Port Huron and the job creators that transit goods across the border have been waiting far too long to streamline operations on the Blue Water Bridge and for the construction of the new plaza.

Today, I believe we are beginning to see the light at the end of this long tunnel and I truly believe that light is a bright new future for the Blue Water Bridge and for our entire region.